Temporal features of size constancy for perception and action in a real-world setting: A combined EEG-kinematics study.

A stable representation of object size, in spite of continuous variations in retinal input due to changes in viewing distance, is critical for perceiving and acting in a real 3D world. In fact, our perceptual and visuo-motor systems exhibit size and grip constancies in order to compensate for the natural shrinkage of the retinal image with increased distance. The neural basis of this size-distance scaling remains largely unknown, although multiple lines of evidence suggest that size-constancy operations might take place remarkably early, already at the level of the primary visual cortex. In this study, we examined for the first time the temporal dynamics of size constancy during perception and action by using a combined measurement of event-related potentials (ERPs) and kinematics. Participants were asked to maintain their gaze steadily on a fixation point and perform either a manual estimation or a grasping task towards disks of different sizes placed at different distances. Importantly, the physical size of the target was scaled with distance to yield a constant retinal angle. Meanwhile, we recorded EEG data from 64 scalp electrodes and hand movements with a motion capture system. We focused on the first positive-going visual evoked component peaking at approximately 90 ms after stimulus onset. We found earlier latencies and greater amplitudes in response to bigger than smaller disks of matched retinal size, regardless of the task. In line with the ERP results, manual estimates and peak grip apertures were larger for the bigger targets. We also found task-related differences at later stages of processing from a cluster of central electrodes, whereby the mean amplitude of the P2 component was greater for manual estimation than grasping. Taken together, these findings provide novel evidence that size constancy for real objects at real distances occurs at the earliest cortical stages and that early visual processing does not change as a function of task demands.

From pictures to reality: modelling the phenomenology and psychophysics of 3D perception.

The dominant inferential approach to human 3D perception assumes a model of spatial encoding based on a physical description of objects and space. Prevailing models based on this physicalist approach assume that the visual system infers an objective, unitary and mostly veridical representation of the external world. However, careful consideration of the phenomenology of 3D perception challenges these assumptions. I review important aspects of phenomenology, psychophysics and neurophysiology which suggest that human visual perception of 3D  objects and space is underwritten by distinct and dissociated spatial encodings that are optimized for specific regions of space. Specifically, I argue that 3D perception is underwritten by at least three distinct encodings for (1) egocentric distance perception at the ambulatory scale, (2) exocentric distance (scaled depth) perception optimized for near space, and (3) perception of object shape and layout (unscaled depth). This tripartite division can more satisfactorily account for the phenomenology, psychophysics and adaptive logic of human 3D perception. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'New approaches to 3D vision'.

Auditory distance perception by blind and sighted participants for both within- and beyond-reach sources.

This study aimed to test the hypothesis that associates blindness with a reduced ability to judge the absolute distance from sound sources. Our working hypotheses were the following: (a) Within reach, a blind subject will be able to make up for the lack of vision using proprioceptive information to calibrate the acoustic distance perception cues. (b) As the source becomes unreachable, blind people will show greater biases since, out of reach, the proposed mechanism for calibration could not be used. To approach these topics, we carried out a series of auditory distance experiments in which we asked sighted and blind participants to report their distance estimates verbally or by reaching the sound source. Within-reach results showed that blind participants performed better than (reaching) or similar to (verbal report) the sighted. The verbal report results showed similar biases between both groups. However, blind participants had more compressive responses than the sighted. Furthermore, blind participants showed more biased responses in the far field than in the peripersonal space, while sighted participants showed similar biases regardless of distance. Our results strongly suggest that the blind can calibrate their distance estimations through the use of proprioceptive spatial information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The effect of textured background and perceived distance on perceived size.

The perceived size of an object depends on its spatial context, in addition to its projected image on the retina and perceived distance. However, how these factors interact with each other to affect perceived object size is still not clear. In this study, we manipulated the binocular disparity of images to assess the effect of perceived distance on perceived object size, as well as background element size to assess the effect of context. The perceived target size under different combinations of perceived distance and context was measured with a two-interval forced-choice paradigm, in which one interval contained a standard disk with a textured background while the other contained a comparison disk on a blank background in each trial. The observers were instructed to indicate which interval contained a larger disk. A staircase procedure was used to measure the point of subjective equality for the perceived target size. Our results showed that the perceived target size increased with the perceived distance while decreased with background element size. In addition, context modulated the relationship between the perceived target size and perceived distance. The data can be explained by a computational model that incorporates several size selective channels whose size sensitivity to a stimulus can be modulated by its disparity. The target response of each channel is subjected to the divisive inhibition signal from the size information in the context. The perceived size is determined by the weighted average of the responses of these size channels. This model can explain more than 91% of variability in the averaged data. Thus, while both perceived distance and context can affect the perceived size of an object, they exert the effect through different mechanisms.

Context dependence of head bobs in gerbils and potential neural contributions.

Headbobs are up-down movements of the cranium associated with the use of motion parallax for depth perception. Mongolian gerbils (aka jirds; Meriones unguiculatus) often execute a series of headbobs prior to jumping between surfaces. Gerbils were tested in a jumping stand task and headbobs videotaped under three light levels approximating low daylight, dawn/dusk, and moonlight across a range of distances to target. Headbobs per trial increased linearly with increasing distance to the target platform, whereas headbob frequency (rate of headbobbing pre-jump on the start platform) increased with gap distance up to an intermediate level and then decreased. Overall, gerbils made the most headbobs per trial under the darkest conditions, whereas their headbobbing rate was highest for medium illumination, especially for medium-long gap distances. There was a positive correlation between headbob frequency and volume of the superior colliculus (SC), but no relationship between headbobs and relative size of the temporo-posterior (TP) visual cortex. The results suggest that gerbils employ a specific visuomotor strategy for depth perception differentially under different conditions. We suggest that the deployment of headbobs under specific conditions may be part of an SC-driven vigilant state, of which more rapid sampling of the visual environment using headbobs for depth estimation is one component. Moreover, the findings highlight the importance of considering ecological factors in designing studies of visual behavior and its underpinnings in rodents.

The role of eye movements in perceiving vehicle speed and time-to-arrival at the roadside.

To avoid collisions, pedestrians depend on their ability to perceive and interpret the visual motion of other road users. Eye movements influence motion perception, yet pedestrians' gaze behavior has been little investigated. In the present study, we ask whether observers sample visual information differently when making two types of judgements based on the same virtual road-crossing scenario and to which extent spontaneous gaze behavior affects those judgements. Participants performed in succession a speed and a time-to-arrival two-interval discrimination task on the same simple traffic scenario-a car approaching at a constant speed (varying from 10 to 90 km/h) on a single-lane road. On average, observers were able to discriminate vehicle speeds of around 18 km/h and times-to-arrival of 0.7 s. In both tasks, observers placed their gaze closely towards the center of the vehicle's front plane while pursuing the vehicle. Other areas of the visual scene were sampled infrequently. No differences were found in the average gaze behavior between the two tasks and a pattern classifier (Support Vector Machine), trained on trial-level gaze patterns, failed to reliably classify the task from the spontaneous eye movements it elicited. Saccadic gaze behavior could predict time-to-arrival discrimination performance, demonstrating the relevance of gaze behavior for perceptual sensitivity in road-crossing.

Slower prefrontal metastable dynamics during deliberation predicts error trials in a distance discrimination task.

Cortical activity related to erroneous behavior in discrimination or decision-making tasks is rarely analyzed, yet it can help clarify which computations are essential during a specific task. Here, we use a hidden Markov model (HMM) to perform a trial-by-trial analysis of the ensemble activity of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFdl) neurons of rhesus monkeys performing a distance discrimination task. By segmenting the neural activity into sequences of metastable states, HMM allows us to uncover modulations of the neural dynamics related to internal computations. We find that metastable dynamics slow down during error trials, while state transitions at a pivotal point during the trial take longer in difficult correct trials. Both these phenomena occur during the decision interval, with errors occurring in both easy and difficult trials. Our results provide further support for the emerging role of metastable cortical dynamics in mediating complex cognitive functions and behavior.

The perception of interpersonal distance is distorted by the Müller-Lyer illusion.

There is growing interest in how human observers perceive social scenes containing multiple people. Interpersonal distance is a critical feature when appraising these scenes; proxemic cues are used by observers to infer whether two people are interacting, the nature of their relationship, and the valence of their current interaction. Presently, however, remarkably little is known about how interpersonal distance is encoded within the human visual system. Here we show that the perception of interpersonal distance is distorted by the Müller-Lyer illusion. Participants perceived the distance between two target points to be compressed or expanded depending on whether face pairs were positioned inside or outside the to-be-judged interval. This illusory bias was found to be unaffected by manipulations of face direction. These findings aid our understanding of how human observers perceive interpersonal distance and may inform theoretical accounts of the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Different effects of spatial separation in action and perception.

Spatial distance of response keys has been shown to have an effect on nonspatial tasks in that performance improved if the spatial distance increased. Comparably, spatial distance of stimulus features has been shown to have a performance-improving effect in a (partly) spatial task. Here, we combined these two findings in the same task to test for the commonality of the effect of stimulus distance and the effect of response distance. Thus, we varied spatial distance in exactly the same fashion either between stimuli or between responses in a standard Eriksen flanker task. The results show that spatial distance only affected the processing of stimulus features, while it had no effect on the processing of response features. Regarding the idea of common coding of action and perception (Prinz, 1990), stimulus and response processing should be influenced by spatial distance in the same way so that our data might suggest a boundary for the idea of common coding.

Reconstructing neural representations of tactile space.

Psychophysical experiments have demonstrated large and highly systematic perceptual distortions of tactile space. Such a space can be referred to our experience of the spatial organisation of objects, at representational level, through touch, in analogy with the familiar concept of visual space. We investigated the neural basis of tactile space by analysing activity patterns induced by tactile stimulation of nine points on a 3 × 3 square grid on the hand dorsum using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We used a searchlight approach within pre-defined regions of interests to compute the pairwise Euclidean distances between the activity patterns elicited by tactile stimulation. Then, we used multidimensional scaling to reconstruct tactile space at the neural level and compare it with skin space at the perceptual level. Our reconstructions of the shape of skin space in contralateral primary somatosensory and motor cortices reveal that it is distorted in a way that matches the perceptual shape of skin space. This suggests that early sensorimotor areas critically contribute to the distorted internal representation of tactile space on the hand dorsum.

Uncorrected Refractive Error and Distance Visual Acuity in Children Aged 6 to 14 Years.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study presents the relationship between distance visual acuity and a range of uncorrected refractive errors, a complex association that is fundamental to clinical eye care and the identification of children needing refractive correction. PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze data from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error Study to describe the relationship between distance uncorrected refractive error and visual acuity in children. METHODS: Subjects were 2212 children (51.2% female) 6 to 14 years of age (mean ± standard deviation, 10.2 ± 2.1 years) participating in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error Study between 2000 and 2010. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was measured using a high-contrast projected logMAR chart. Cycloplegic refractive error was measured using the Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. The ability of logMAR acuity to detect various categories of refractive error was examined using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Isoacuity curves show that increasing myopic spherical refractive errors, increasing astigmatic refractive errors, or a combination of both reduces distance visual acuity. Visual acuity was reduced by approximately 0.5 minutes of MAR per 0.30 to 0.40 D of spherical refractive error and by approximately 0.5 minutes of MAR per 0.60 to 0.90 D of astigmatism. Higher uncorrected hyperopic refractive error had little effect on distance visual acuity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggests that a logMAR distance acuity of 0.20 to 0.32 provides the best balance between sensitivity and specificity for detecting refractive errors other than hyperopia. Distance acuity alone was ineffective for detecting hyperopic refractive errors. CONCLUSIONS: Higher myopic and/or astigmatic refractive errors were associated with predictable reductions in uncorrected distance visual acuity. The reduction in acuity per diopter of cylindrical error was about half that for spherical myopic error. Although distance acuity may be a useful adjunct to the detection of myopic spherocylindrical refractive errors, accommodation presumably prevents acuity from assisting in the detection of hyperopia. Alternate procedures need to be used to detect hyperopia.

The prominent role of perceptual salience in object discrimination: overt discrimination of graspable side does not activate grasping affordances.

Responses to object stimuli are often faster when jutting handles are aligned with responding hands, than when they are not: handle-to-hand correspondence effects. According to a location coding account, locations of visually salient jutting parts determine the spatial coding of objects. This asymmetry then facilitates same-sided responses compared to responses on the opposite side. Alternatively, this effect has been attributed to grasping actions of the left or the right hand afforded by the handle orientation and independent of its salience (affordance activation account). Our experiments were designed to disentangle the effects of pure salience from those of affordance activations. We selected pictures of tools with one salient and non-graspable side, and one graspable and non-salient side (non-jutting handle). Two experiments were run. Each experiment had two groups of participants: one group discriminated the location of the salient side of the object stimuli; the other group discriminated the location of the graspable side of them. In Experiment 1, responses were left and right button presses; in Experiment 2, they were left and right button presses plus reach-and-grasp actions. When visual salience was removed from graspable sides, no correspondence effect was observed between their orientation and the responding hands in both the experiments. Conversely, when salience depended on non-graspable portions, a correspondence effect was produced between their orientation and the responding hand. Overt attention to graspable sides did not potentiate any grasping affordance even when participants executed grasping responses in addition to button presses. Results support the location coding account: performance was influenced by the spatial coding of visually salient properties of objects.

Time-to-contact perception in the brain.

Time-to-contact (TTC) perception refers to the ability of an observer to estimate the remaining time before an object reaches a point in the environment, and is of crucial importance in daily life. Noninvasive correlational approaches have identified several brain areas sensitive to TTC information. Here we report the results of two studies, including one during an awake brain surgery, that aimed to identify the specific areas causally engaged in the TTC estimation process. In Study 1, we tested 40 patients with brain tumor in a TTC estimation task. The results showed that four of the six patients with impaired performance had tumors in right upper parietal cortex, although this tumoral location represented only six over 40 patients. In Study 2, 15 patients underwent awake brain surgery electrostimulation mapping to examine the implication of various brain areas in the TTC estimation process. We acquired and normalized to MNI space the coordinates of the functional areas that influenced task performance. Our results seem to demonstrate that the early stage of the TTC estimation process involved specific cortical territories in the ventral region of the right intraparietal sulcus. Downstream processing of TTC could also involve the frontal eye field (middle frontal gyrus) related to ocular search. We also found that deactivating language areas in the left hemisphere interfered with the TTC estimation process. These findings demonstrate a fine grained, cortical representation of TTC processing close to the ventral right intraparietal sulcus and complement those described in other human studies.

The Motor Representation of Sensory Experience.

How do we estimate the position of an object in the world around us? Naturally, we would direct our gaze to that object. Accordingly, neural motor coordinates entail the distance of external objects and thus might be used to derive perceptual estimates. Several general frameworks in the history of perceptual science have offered such a view.1-4 However, a mechanism showing how motor and visual processes communicate remains elusive. Here, we report that every post-saccadic error biases visual localization in a serially dependent manner. In order to simulate a realignment of visual space through motor coordinates, we induced an artificial de-alignment between visual and motor space. We found that when performing saccades under this distortion, post-saccadic error information clearly realigned visual and motor space, again in a serially dependent manner. These results demonstrate that the consequences of every saccade directly influence where we see objects in the world. On a neural basis, this requires that motor signals, which generate close to the saccade production machinery, are reported to cortical areas and arrange visual space. This view is consistent with recent electrophysiological findings of post-saccadic error processing in posterior parietal cortex.5.

Is the Vertical-Horizontal Illusion a Byproduct of the Environmental Vertical Illusion?

The vertical-horizontal illusion is the overestimation of a vertical line compared to a horizontal line of the same length. Jackson and Cormack (2007) proposed that the vertical-horizontal illusion might be a byproduct of the mechanisms that generate the environmental vertical illusion, which is the tendency to overestimate vertical distances (i.e., heights) relative to horizontal distances the same length. In our study, 326 undergraduate participants stood atop an 18.6-meter parking structure and estimated both the height of the structure and the horizontal distance of a target placed 18.6 meters away, using a moveable horizontal target across the length of the structure. Participants also completed a vertical-horizontal illusion task by drawing a horizontal line below a 9.1 cm vertical line. We correlated vertical distance estimates with vertical line estimates to test Jackson and Cormack's byproduct hypothesis. This hypothesis was very weakly-if at all-supported by the data: Participants' overestimations in the vertical-horizontal illusion task explained 1% of the variance associated with their overestimations in the environmental vertical illusion task. Additionally, to test whether the environmental vertical illusion is impervious to explicit awareness, a random half of our participants were advised to be mindful that people tend to overestimate heights. The results supported our second hypothesis: Even when participants were made aware of the environmental vertical illusion, they still reliably overestimated heights. Discussion addressed implications for the robustness of the environmental vertical illusion (e.g., treatment of those with acrophobia).

Validation of the Clouclip and utility in measuring viewing distance in adults.

PURPOSE: To validate the Clouclip, a continuously measuring objective rangefinder, and examine viewing behaviours during various near tasks in non-myopic and myopic adults. METHODS: In experiment 1, five Clouclip devices were utilised. An infrared camera was used to visualise and measure infrared beam size and angle. Repeatability for distance tracking was assessed from 5 to 120 cm in 5 cm increments. Accuracy of distance tracking was investigated for paper and iPad targets, spatial integration was calculated, effects of target tilt were determined and light measurements were compared to a lux meter. In experiment 2, viewing behaviour was assessed in 41 subjects (21 non-myopic, 20 myopic) during four 15-min near tasks; (1) passive reading of printed material, (2) active writing on printed material, (3) passive viewing on an electronic device and (4) active engagement on an electronic device. Working distance was compared between tasks and refractive error groups. RESULTS: Clouclip distance tracking showed good repeatability, with a mean difference of 0.34 cm and limits of agreement of ±2.0 cm. Clouclip-measured and actual distances were highly correlated for paper and electronic targets from 5 to 120 cm, with mean differences and limits of agreement of 3.96 ± 13.78 cm and 4.48 ± 8.92 cm, respectively; variability increased for distances >100 cm. Tracking ability increased with larger target sizes; tracking was accurate when the target occupied 1.5%-20.3% of tracking beam area, depending on distance and with target tilt up to ±60 degrees. Clouclip- and lux meter-measured ambient illumination were highly correlated for a wide range of intensities (r = 0.96, p < 0.001), but with greater variability for intensities >20 000 lux. The Clouclip infrared beam was measured to have a diameter of 25.6 ± 2.2° and a downward angle of 10.3 ± 0.5°. For subject testing, viewing distance was significantly closer for active and passive printed tasks (29.5 ± 6.7 cm and 33.2 ± 8.8 cm, respectively) than for active and passive electronic tasks (35.4 ± 8.0 cm and 40.8 ± 10.4 cm, respectively), with no differences between refractive error groups (p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The Clouclip performed well in measuring near and intermediate distances and could distinguish between indoor (<1000 lux) and outdoor (>1000 lux) illumination. A closer working distance was observed for printed tasks compared to those on an iPad, with no difference in viewing distance between non-myopic and myopic adults.

Egocentric Distance Perception: A Comparative Study Investigating Differences Between Real and Virtual Environments.

Virtual reality systems are a popular tool in behavioral sciences. The participants' behavior is, however, a response to cognitively processed stimuli. Consequently, researchers must ensure that virtually perceived stimuli resemble those present in the real world to ensure the ecological validity of collected findings. Our article provides a literature review relating to distance perception in virtual reality. Furthermore, we present a new study that compares verbal distance estimates within real and virtual environments. The virtual space-a replica of a real outdoor area-was displayed using a state-of-the-art head-mounted display. Investigated distances ranged from 8 to 13 m. Overall, the results show no significant difference between egocentric distance estimates in real and virtual environments. However, a more in-depth analysis suggests that the order in which participants were exposed to the two environments may affect the outcome. Furthermore, the study suggests that a rising experience of immersion leads to an alignment of the estimated virtual distances with the real ones. The results also show that the discrepancy between estimates of real and virtual distances increases with the incongruity between virtual and actual eye heights, demonstrating the importance of an accurately set virtual eye height.

Inaccurate Space Perception Seeing Through Fences.

According to the sequential surface integration process hypothesis, the fine near-ground-surface representation and the homogeneous ground surface play a vital role in the representation of the ground surface. When an occluding box or opaque wall is placed between observers and targets, observers underestimate egocentric distance. However, in our daily life, many obstacles are perforated and cover the ground surface and targets simultaneously (e.g., fences). Humans see and observe through fences. The images of these fences and targets, projected onto observers' retinas, overlap each other. This study aims to explore the effects of perforated obstacles (i.e., fences) on space perception. The results showed that observers underestimated the egocentric distances when there was a fence on the ground surface relative to the no-fence condition, and the effect of widely spaced thick wood fences was larger than that of narrowly spaced thin iron fences. We further demonstrated that this effect was quite robust when the target size had a visual angle of 1°, 2°, or 4° in three virtual reality experiments. This study may add support for the notion that the sequential surface integration process hypothesis is applicable even if the obstacle is perforated and covers the target.

The Visual Perception of Large-Scale Distances Outdoors.

The ability of 32 younger (ages ranged from 19 to 32 years) and older adults (ages ranged from 65 to 83 years) to visually perceive outdoor distances was evaluated; we used the method of equal-appearing intervals. On any given trial, the observers adjusted five distance intervals in depth so that they all appeared equivalent in magnitude (and equal to a standard initial egocentric distance of 6 m). The judgments of approximately two thirds of the younger and older observers exhibited varying degrees of perceptual compression, while those of the remaining one third were essentially accurate. Unlike a number of previous studies that evaluated the perception of shorter distances, no significant effects of age were obtained in the current experiment. In particular, there were no significant effects of age upon either accuracy or precision. The ability of human observers to evaluate large-scale distances outdoors is well maintained with increasing age.

Effects of viewing distance on ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) for air- and bone-conducted stimuli at multiple sites.

BACKGROUND: The ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential is otolith-dependent and has been suggested to be a manifestation of the linear vestibulo-ocular reflex (L-VOR). A characteristic feature of the translational LVOR (t-LVOR) is its dependence on the distance of a target. OBJECTIVE: To assess if viewing distance affects amplitude and latency properties of the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMPs). METHODS: Bone- and air-conducted (BC and AC) stimuli were used to evoke oVEMPs in 10 healthy subjects. BC stimuli consisted of impulsive accelerations applied at the mastoids, AFz, Oz and Iz. AC stimuli consisted of 500 Hz tones delivered unilaterally to each ear. Target distances of 40 cm (near), 190 cm (intermediate) and 340 cm (far) were used for all stimuli. RESULTS: The largest amplitude oVEMP was obtained from Iz and the latency for AFz was shorter than for BC stimulation at other sites. We found no significant effect of target distance on oVEMP amplitudes for any of the stimuli used. There was a small but significant effect on latency with the nearest target having a longer latency (overall 12.4 ms vs 12.0 ms for the 2 more distant sites). CONCLUSIONS: Previously reported differences between latencies and stimulus sites for midline BC stimulation were confirmed. Target distance had no significant effect on oVEMP amplitude, which suggests it is not modified like other components of the t-LVOR.